The continuous trade disputes between the United States and China have created substantial strains on American tech enterprises, compelling them to adjust to unforeseen financial hurdles. The latest tariff hikes by President Donald Trump’s administration have altered the fiscal landscape for companies dependent on Chinese production. For numerous technology firms, these measures have resulted in heightened expenses, interrupted supply networks, and greater unpredictability, leaving the industry in a vulnerable state.
Deena Ghazarian, who established Austere, an electronics firm located in California, felt the impact of these shifts directly. Not long after starting her company in 2019, she was confronted with an unexpected 25% tariff on the premium audio and video accessories imported from China. The business, which showed initial promise, rapidly became a financial challenge. The new expenses, absent before, jeopardized the company’s viability.
“I truly believed my company wouldn’t survive its initial year,” Ghazarian reflects. The abrupt tariff imposition compelled her to take on the increased costs to maintain competitiveness, resulting in very slim profit margins. While Austere was able to withstand the early obstacles, the business is once again facing a similar situation as tariffs have reemerged with an even wider application and elevated rates during Trump’s second term.
“I honestly thought my company wouldn’t make it through its first year,” Ghazarian recalls. The sudden implementation of tariffs forced her to absorb the added expenses to stay competitive, leaving her margins razor-thin. Although Austere managed to endure the initial challenges, the company now finds itself navigating a similar predicament as tariffs have returned with even broader scope and higher rates under Trump’s second term.
The current tariff structure significantly impacts a wide range of electronic goods, including smartphones, tablets, laptops, and video game consoles, many of which are predominantly produced in China. According to the Consumer Technology Association (CTA), China remains the largest supplier of electronics to the United States, with imports totaling $146 billion as recently as 2023. This includes 78% of smartphones, 79% of laptops and tablets, and nearly 87% of video game consoles entering the U.S. market.
The financial burden of these tariffs falls directly on U.S. importers rather than manufacturers in China, leaving American businesses and consumers to shoulder the costs. Ed Brzytwa, vice president of international trade at the CTA, points out that these additional expenses often trickle down to shoppers in the form of higher prices. For companies operating on slim profit margins, passing these costs onto consumers becomes unavoidable.
Although some companies have looked for other manufacturing options outside of China, moving supply chains to places like Vietnam, Thailand, and India, these changes are neither swift nor inexpensive. Mary Lovely, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, notes that creating new supplier connections requires time and significant investment. Moreover, only a few countries provide the same level of scale and expertise as China, which continues to be a key player in global tech manufacturing.
While some businesses have sought alternatives to Chinese manufacturing, shifting supply chains to countries like Vietnam, Thailand, and India, these transitions are neither quick nor cost-effective. Mary Lovely, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, explains that developing new supplier relationships takes time and substantial investment. Additionally, few nations offer the same scale and expertise as China, which remains a cornerstone of global technology production.
Domestic manufacturing in the U.S. has seen slight growth as a result of these tariffs, with firms like Apple increasing production in India and Taiwanese chipmaker TSMC spreading its operations to Arizona. Despite these initiatives, the move towards localized production encounters obstacles, such as elevated operating expenses and strict regulations.
For smaller companies like Austere, the enduring effects of these tariffs are a major worry. Ghazarian considers the option of increasing prices to counterbalance expenses but is concerned about losing customers in an already challenging economic climate. “There’s a threshold to what consumers are ready to pay for perceived value,” she notes. “If we exceed that, we risk losing them completely, particularly with inflation already squeezing household finances.”
In Trump’s initial term, a few companies managed to secure exemptions from specific tariffs, and there is speculation that similar exceptions might develop depending on upcoming trade discussions. However, Trump has often used tariffs as a negotiating tactic, adding unpredictability to the long-term perspective for businesses.
The possibility of an economic downturn in the U.S. introduces an additional layer of complexity. Should growth slow, the administration might revisit its tariff strategy to prevent further economic harm. For the moment, though, the likelihood of relaxing trade barriers seems minimal, as Trump has indicated intentions to raise tariffs on Chinese products even further and expand duties to additional countries.
The effects of these policies reach beyond the United States. Should Chinese producers move operations to countries with steeper labor expenses, worldwide prices for tech items might increase. Moreover, retaliatory tariffs from other countries could interfere with the export of U.S. technology, placing additional stress on the sector.
The implications of these policies extend beyond American borders. If Chinese manufacturers relocate production to countries with higher labor costs, global prices for tech products could rise. Additionally, retaliatory tariffs from other nations could disrupt the flow of U.S. technology exports, further straining the industry.
Despite these challenges, Ghazarian remains determined to adapt. By stockpiling inventory before the latest tariffs went into effect, she has gained temporary relief to weather the storm. Looking ahead, she is exploring cost-cutting measures and alternative production methods to keep her business afloat. “I had hoped to focus on growth and innovation, but instead, so much of my time is spent on survival strategies,” she laments.
The ongoing trade war underscores the delicate balance between economic policy and its unintended consequences. While the administration’s tariffs aim to achieve broader geopolitical goals, they have created ripple effects that reverberate through industries and households alike. For U.S. tech firms, the road ahead will require resilience, adaptability, and a willingness to navigate an increasingly uncertain global trade landscape.
